POLI398Z Conflict Resolution: Class of Nov 11 - 2004

POLI398Z Conflict Resolution
Class of Nov 11 - 2004

mediator: to broker a deal b/w two parties

why a party would not want a mediator:
1 - thinks mediator is biased
2 - thinks it can win the conflict
3 - thinks it profits from status quo (mediator is threatening)

discussion about mediators' reaction to threats:
take this as any other moves from party involved and reason it over. "go to balcony" and think it over.
confidentiality questions.

"neutral" is a very diverse concept

danger that party starts to think mediator is on there side (active listening confusion/paradox)

mediator should'nt be the one delivering the terms of agreement: must directs parties ("shuttle diplomacy") to figure out where parties can meet if there is a possible "zopa"

if NOPA: try to reality-test parties: "is there something you want more than others", try get other person that its in there interest to move further: creating value pieced with negotiator talent

when people to suspicious about mediator bias, mediator should leave

being able to soften up people: talent

family law context: divorce: mediator: assymetry of power situation: challenge for mediator, because mediator is struggling with levelling and pulling up one party.

job is not to part with a party but to get to equal agreement, if circumstance not equal its a problem.