Class notes: Walter Benjamin
Walter Benjamin
Modern aesthetic + non-modern myths = fascism (see Leni Riefensthal)
That satisfies the disenfranchised men, masses
"organic totality" under fascism: reinscribe totality of masses
Fascism leads to war
- movement that turns technology to war-making
- to avoid "revolution" by channeling "change" toward war: Imperialism outward so that "society" will be preserved: nationalism
Imperialism: a revolt of technology, a fetish for destruction
On History
Published posthumously?
Tragic, revolutionary hopes
a cry against complacency
rejects linearity of history: its separate pieces of toughts
greater projects
- arguing concept of history as progressive consequence of history ... woah i dont make sense
against "determinism" & necessary laws without human agency
subjectivity of visions
method:
- looking at details
- be verrrry empirical
non-developed future not separate from present
a discontinuous model
against all-encompassing answers
through remebrance you can make away with complete incompletedness of history
messianism: it can be at any time, no need for an utopian end-time paradise
wrong use of past: corrupted present
past should be remebered in its entirety, piously
directly connected to the present
"nothing that has ever happenned should be regarded as lost for history
every day is judgement day
"progress" = destruction and wreckage
present is a perpetual catastrophy
totalitarianism = he who controls the present controls the future and control the past (from Orwell "1984")
rewritting past is rewritting who we are
Modern aesthetic + non-modern myths = fascism (see Leni Riefensthal)
That satisfies the disenfranchised men, masses
"organic totality" under fascism: reinscribe totality of masses
Fascism leads to war
- movement that turns technology to war-making
- to avoid "revolution" by channeling "change" toward war: Imperialism outward so that "society" will be preserved: nationalism
Imperialism: a revolt of technology, a fetish for destruction
On History
Published posthumously?
Tragic, revolutionary hopes
a cry against complacency
rejects linearity of history: its separate pieces of toughts
greater projects
- arguing concept of history as progressive consequence of history ... woah i dont make sense
against "determinism" & necessary laws without human agency
subjectivity of visions
method:
- looking at details
- be verrrry empirical
non-developed future not separate from present
a discontinuous model
against all-encompassing answers
through remebrance you can make away with complete incompletedness of history
messianism: it can be at any time, no need for an utopian end-time paradise
wrong use of past: corrupted present
past should be remebered in its entirety, piously
directly connected to the present
"nothing that has ever happenned should be regarded as lost for history
every day is judgement day
"progress" = destruction and wreckage
present is a perpetual catastrophy
totalitarianism = he who controls the present controls the future and control the past (from Orwell "1984")
rewritting past is rewritting who we are
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home